While Massachusetts previous year became the first state wanting each one to purchase health insurance, the proposals in California could come up with an even bolder trial, because the Golden State’s problems are so much larger. “It’s now a bigger face in California,” says Marian Mulkey, a senior program officer at California HealthCare Foundation, a non-profit organization think tank. “That’s not to say it’s insurmountable.”
California health insurance, for example, a predictable 4.9 million people are short of health insurance. That compares with a forecast 500,000 in Massachusetts before its plan began. That’s why politicians from other states — along with policy specialists and officials in Congress — are watching the California try closely, with its latent to set a nationwide model. Some desire a worldwide program paid for and overseen completely by the government. Some states all individuals must be obligatory to purchase health coverage, while others say such a go-ahead is draconian when premium costs are so high.
Health insurance in California hit a barrier surprises few. The challenge is huge and the solutions are contentious, splitting lawmakers. Republicans devastatingly do not support the two Democratic health-improvement measures, which are in play in California, nor did any back the governor’s plan. While their suggestion shares some of the governor’s ideas, Democrats part with Schwarzenegger in two important ways: They do not desire to need individuals to purchase health insurance, and they wish employers who do not provide insurance to pay more than the governor proposes.
“Any development in California would make a considerable dent in the problem of the uninsured nationally,” says Larry Levitt, a health insurance policy forecaster for the Kaiser Family Foundation, a non-profit study group based in Menlo Park, Calif. “Action in California would make genuine momentum, both in the presidential debate and in other states.”
In Massachusetts, years of preparation went into the health-reform attempt before the government — overpoweringly in agreement — passed its measure. “If you are going to refinance one-sixth of the world economy, you would better not do it on a 50-to-49 vote,” says Jon Kings dale, head of the state agency overseeing rollout of the program in Massachusetts. “Enacting something is only semi the challenge.”